Chicken Well-known member Joined Nov 30, 2010 Messages 3,383 Reaction score 0 Dec 6, 2012 #21 Dec your as reliable as me uploading pics. Haha
Dubz Well-known member Joined Feb 6, 2012 Messages 1,844 Reaction score 0 Location Kettering Dec 7, 2012 #22 Sure you are
133_Ads Well-known member Joined Aug 21, 2012 Messages 1,388 Reaction score 0 Location Chester Dec 7, 2012 #23 Is that it :roll:
133_Ads Well-known member Joined Aug 21, 2012 Messages 1,388 Reaction score 0 Location Chester Dec 7, 2012 #24 It's quite bad, but it could be a run where something has gone wrong?
BlackTwingo-i Well-known member Joined Dec 8, 2010 Messages 2,850 Reaction score 0 Location Blackpool Dec 7, 2012 #25 This thread should be named 'worst thread fail ever' !!!
Jjay Well-known member Joined Aug 5, 2012 Messages 1,192 Reaction score 0 Location Bromley, Kent Dec 7, 2012 #26 Oh no best dyno I seen was a 172 that peaked at 128hp and dropped off within seconds...
waitey Well-known member Joined Aug 16, 2011 Messages 2,893 Reaction score 0 Location Coalville, Leicestershire Dec 7, 2012 #27 Jjay":4392veey said: Oh no best dyno I seen was a 172 that peaked at 128hp and dropped off within seconds... Click to expand... That'll be me tomorrow probably
Jjay":4392veey said: Oh no best dyno I seen was a 172 that peaked at 128hp and dropped off within seconds... Click to expand... That'll be me tomorrow probably
singlespeed Well-known member Joined Feb 6, 2011 Messages 6,385 Reaction score 2 Location Moray Dec 7, 2012 #28 it would probably have been be quicker before the remap. Its one thing having low down torque, but not if your loosing out so much at the top end. I wonder how far out the cam timing is?
it would probably have been be quicker before the remap. Its one thing having low down torque, but not if your loosing out so much at the top end. I wonder how far out the cam timing is?