Suspension Lower Balljoint Rubbers

Twingo Forum

Help Support Twingo Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
DrDrew":26mkycs2 said:
They can say that changing the suspension parts (i.e. coilovers) could effect the failed part - so be willing to cover less with you having modified the suspension away from standard

Thought that might be the case, I'll see what they say tomorrow
 
DrDrew":4xjk0wtp said:
They can say that changing the suspension parts (i.e. coilovers) could effect the failed part - so be willing to cover less with you having modified the suspension away from standard

I'm not stock att all but they guive the 75% before they start working on car

and they don't really care
 
mazmaz":3ksd4edy said:
DrDrew":3ksd4edy said:
They can say that changing the suspension parts (i.e. coilovers) could effect the failed part - so be willing to cover less with you having modified the suspension away from standard

I'm not stock att all but they guive the 75% before they start working on car

and they don't really care


That's good from Renault on your behalf though
I'm sure there's been someone in this thread that was told they weren't covered, as they had coilovers
 
Apart from the fact they're visibly worn and have leaked, they're not replacing them as the garage has said they're not showing any sign of wear at all.

Yet apparently there's significant wear in the bushes and the cover for the track rods, which Carrie will verify were like new when we checked at the weekend, and as a result no offer of warranty on the part and I've got a fight on my hands. Naturally the woman who called back (after I chased for an update as we haven't heard a thing, even to say they're on it) was not mechanically minded at all, so working in a service department was clearly not helpful!

Needless to say I'm tempted to buy the parts and sort it myself purely to get this over with.

Incidentally they wanted 42% more for the parts alone and excluding delivery than Karl has priced up delivered
 
And the result is Renault UK want to contribute 50% to a part I'm not convinced needs any attention (excessive play in the rack, which as far as I could tell with the car up last weekend looked as new with no sign of wear and tear, and the price with the contribution is basically the same as Karls quoted for the parts.

I'm going to have an independent engineers report made so I can at least get them to look at the ball joints properly, and realise that they need replacing.

I'm happy to try any joints Neil thinks might fit and use the car as a Guinea Pig :lol:
 
maggi112":2o3rsqa0 said:
And the result is Renault UK want to contribute 50% to a part I'm not convinced needs any attention (excessive play in the rack, which as far as I could tell with the car up last weekend looked as new with no sign of wear and tear, and the price with the contribution is basically the same as Karls quoted for the parts.

I'm going to have an independent engineers report made so I can at least get them to look at the ball joints properly, and realise that they need replacing.

I'm happy to try any joints Neil thinks might fit and use the car as a Guinea Pig :lol:
You can rule out the MGF/Metro screw in joints as the screw thread is too small in diameter.
 
There's a single (rather corroded) Nearside wishbone from a 182 cup on the bay of e.

Do Renault sell the ball joints for these on their own? If so I'll take a punt at it and measure it up as a possible replacement
 
maggi112":366xmwrk said:
And the result is Renault UK want to contribute 50% to a part I'm not convinced needs any attention (excessive play in the rack, which as far as I could tell with the car up last weekend looked as new with no sign of wear and tear, and the price with the contribution is basically the same as Karls quoted for the parts.

I'm going to have an independent engineers report made so I can at least get them to look at the ball joints properly, and realise that they need replacing.

I'm happy to try any joints Neil thinks might fit and use the car as a Guinea Pig :lol:


Take it I'm the bloody guinea pig!
 
Yep.

I've asked a few people for measurements on the wishbones, although I'm not sure what I'm after :lol: I'm sure technical details exist for the position of the subframe to actually make this easier....

I'm about to order the wishbone and will offer it up to the original, and then we can try and see how the geometry is affected, if at all.

If it's a go, this could be a replacement. I've got a few calls to make this lunchtime it seems.
 
Wow, Renault were in no way helpful in this case then. I need to call them myself still to get mine checked, hopefully it doesn't go the way yours has!
 
It's mostly due to the dealer, which in the past I've found unhelpful when looking at cars.

They simply disagree that they're gone, when the grease is on the outside of the rubber and rubber has split, I'm not sure what else they could be :lol: TBH I'd prefer to do it myself, and find a long term solution to replacing the ball joints, rather than relying on Renault to replace the whole wishbone. Renault won't continue to replace them forever
 
Know the car's up in Lincolnshire, and dealers are sparse around - but you though of taking a day trip to somewhere like Peterborough to try another dealer?
 
maggi112":134x3t2d said:
It's mostly due to the dealer, which in the past I've found unhelpful when looking at cars.

They simply disagree that they're gone, when the grease is on the outside of the rubber and rubber has split, I'm not sure what else they could be :lol: TBH I'd prefer to do it myself, and find a long term solution to replacing the ball joints, rather than relying on Renault to replace the whole wishbone. Renault won't continue to replace them forever

This is true. I think I might end up going down the same road. Keep me updated on a solution if you find one!

I emailed Powerflex the other to ask if they planned on doing any bushes for the Twingo soon, but alas they aren't :(
 
DrDrew":3fhx3tq8 said:
Know the car's up in Lincolnshire, and dealers are sparse around - but you though of taking a day trip to somewhere like Peterborough to try another dealer?

The problem is getting the time off although Maggi's in Watford and they were just as useless. It looks like a hood dealership is hard to find. Its a shame the Vauxhall dealer down the road isn't reanult. They do my services and they are fantastic. Know me by first name, even though I've only been in a few times, and I trust their work. They know not to bull shit me as the guy I bought the car from now works there's and actually remembered me even though it was 3 Yeats ago!
 
After an afternoon of trawling for possible options, Citroen balljoints may be an answer. Well, they look like an answer. Whether they measure up and will fit the thread in the wishbone and have the correct size taper to the hub carrier, remains to be seen. Theres a few options to go through with them.
 
Tried two of the joints that the motor factors had in stock and neither of them match up.
FBJ5124 with 38mm thread (seems close to twingo size)
https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/BALL-JOINT-LOWER-RH-CITROEN-BX19-1-9-1986-1986-5124-67-/111172261509?pt=UK_CarsParts_Vehicles_CarParts_SM&hash=item19e2621685

Taper is too small


FBJ5276 with 40mm thread
https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/BALL-JOINT-LOWER-LH-CITROEN-XM-2-0-1989-1992-5276-1143-/300969190463?pt=UK_CarsParts_Vehicles_CarParts_SM&hash=item461329643f


FBJ5424
https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/BALL-JOINT-LOWER-RH-CITROEN-C4-1-4I-2004-5424-188-/290980197097?pt=UK_CarsParts_Vehicles_CarParts_SM&hash=item43bfc572e9


FBJ5457
https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/BALL-JOINT-UPPER-LH-CITROEN-C6-2-2TD-2006-5457-535-/290980212595?pt=UK_CarsParts_Vehicles_CarParts_SM&hash=item43bfc5af73

overall too large. Taper too big and screw thread too big

whilst I was at it, I took some measurements of the wishbone. Although I didn't remove the balljoint so couldn't confirm the thread diameter of pitch where it screws in the arm. The thing is rather tight and I was only using two bolts tightened in the vice to try and use these as a peg spanner to undo it

Small diameter
9954326355_14ca4584c1_b_d.jpg


9954349994_8d7d010be4_b_d.jpg


Large diameter
9954331395_afb6dc6fa1_b_d.jpg


Aproximate length of engagement of taper in hub carrier
9954463623_f6a93fc095_b_d.jpg


M12 x 1.25 thread
9954357974_b78c4df9a1_b_d.jpg


9954469833_477cee488a_b_d.jpg


9954472353_f6922e39f5_b_d.jpg


9954370686_b47e9173a6_b_d.jpg


Probably a 40mm thread if the outside diameter could be measured
9954478653_604729533c_b_d.jpg


8mm pegs to be spaced as below pics
9954376586_6514015f1f_b_d.jpg


9954379466_fefae1f97f_b_d.jpg
 
Where I thought my rubber was starting to split, it was just a manufacturing mark and not the start of a split :cool:

So, if anyone wants to try the other two joints for size and make up a 4-pin tool for un-screwing the original joint, please feel free to horse on :mrgreen:
 
Top