oscar":2xakfr5m said:it's not an acknowledged common pattern failure in their technical bulletins, that's the point in letting renault know via an owners group of a common failure pattern that they haven't picked up on yet. it really doesn't cost anything for renault to inform the manufacturer of the joint that the boot's split and rendered the ball joint humped on what appears to be many a 133. but an interesting point to throw into the fold is that i'm 2008 / 50,000miles in and still on factory ball joints and boots to the best of my knowledge, i at least can confirm i have done 28,000miles on them from when i bought the car and they are still in tip top shape after having the backside booted out of it daily. wood has been touched firmly
waitey":16hcqkcm said:If they're only acknowledged as a common fault mr.knowitall how come that they still deny it after almost every 133 we know of has had to replace this part for the exact reason as the others?
If you answered this, I didn't bother reading all of that due to bad or lack of paragraphing making it a pain to read.
Well that was my thinking just thought I would ask.waitey":230fa8rf said:Could be a revised part
Well that was my thinking just thought I would ask.waitey":8rdimub8 said:Could be a revised part
Enter your email address to join: